the bush agreement in 1990 didn't necessarily stink to high heaven in the first four days. it's when you are trying to run for election two years later that people look at it, you know, after the iraq war for crying out loud, they went back and revisited and said, kind of like t.a.r.p., we were told it was an emergency, we voted for it, but two years out, it really looks like a bad idea, so any republican or democrat voting on one of these deals, my recommendation is they should have to stay for seven days, written down on-line so every american, not just the lobbyists in washington, d.c., for all the spending interests, but all of the american people, can see what's in this agreement and then and only then should people in the house or senate vote yes or no. because i think they'll regret if they rush into something that turns out like obama care was, to be very different than what was advertised. >> grover, let me give you break for a second and bring in my panel here who have been all diligently waiting patiently and quietly. joy, david brooks writes in the "new york tim